-
Francis Alys - Fabiola (2008)
“The story of St. Fabiola, a 4th-century Roman aristocrat from the Fabia family who is supposed to have been an early Mother Teresa, became popular in the late 19th century, and an 1885 portrait of her by a French academician (which is now lost) has since been endlessly copied around the world.
Appearing on postcards, posters and religious trinkets, Fabiola has been a beloved subject for countless painters, most of them amateurs. The portrait’s format is almost always the same: Fabiola is seen in profile facing left, her head covered by a rich red veil.
Mr. Alys, who was born in Belgium in 1959 and moved to Mexico City in 1990, began collecting Fabiola paintings—as the genre is called—about 15 years ago, buying them at thrift shops, flea markets and antiques stores primarily in Mexico and Europe. He has previously shown his collection three times, when it was much smaller; the current presentation includes more than 300 works.”
(via wnycradiolab)
Posted on May 21, 2013 via not shaking the grass with 1,755 notes
Source: likeafieldmouse
-
(via willlaren)
Posted on May 21, 2013 via i'm the King of Thing with 2,018 notes
Source: lampghost
-
David Foster Wallace was like, Art must be sincere! We must use every tool in the linguistic toolbox to cut through sentiment and dishonest cliche and build fresh ways to reveal the power and reality of unironized emotion.
And Mister Rogers was like, Basically the same thing, but without any shame or pretense or fear of sincerity.Posted on May 21, 2013 via xoxo gossip leena with 54,114 notes
Source: marketwarriors
-
Request Week 2 - thankgoditsover
The Fall, 2006
Cinematography: Colin Watkinson(via waltzedwithchristoph)
Posted on May 21, 2013 via Movies In Color with 214 notes
Source: moviesincolor
-

Posted on May 21, 2013 via Coffee, God, and Cigarettes! with 6,151 notes
Source: letsblametheworld
-
(via waltzedwithchristoph)
Posted on May 19, 2013 via oop with 2,510 notes
Source: trugazi
-
(via torgocoyne)
Posted on May 18, 2013 via Underneath the concrete sky with 158,941 notes
Source: subcircular
-
Don Draper’s Old Fashioned, The Dude’s White Russian, Hunter S. Thompson’s Singapore Sling, Daisy Buchanan’s Mint Julep, and more in our new Cocktail Chart of Film and Literature.
(via torgocoyne)
Posted on May 17, 2013 via Pop Chart Lab with 1,957 notes
Source: popchartlab
-
Common Descent
There’s a famous old anecdote about Charlemagne that’s been used for ages to explain how interconnected we are among our biological pasts. It has been said that everyone of European ancestry is related to Charlemagne, the great King of the Franks, born in 742 AD. If you’re European, you’re royalty. How is that possible?
I’ll tell you another tidbit first: Not only do all Europeans share Charlemagne as an ancestor, they share everyone alive at the same time as Charlemagne as an ancestor. Everyone who had kids, anyway. Let me explain:
Everyone alive has two biological parents. They each have two parents themselves, for a total of four grandparents. For x number of generations that you travel back in time, you have 2^x direct grandparents of increasing separation. Extrapolate that back to Charlie’s time, and you’d need 1 trillion grandparents to cover all your ancestral bases. Michael from Vsauce did a video about it. Since that’s far more people than have ever been alive, we need to engage some incest to solve the problem. Not banjo-applesauce incest, just a bit of redrawing our family trees into family webs.
Somewhere, far enough back in the web of grandparents, we will find a person whose lines connect to every single person who comes after them. That zig-zagged trail of shared genetic history ends surprisingly recently (for Euros, again): A common European ancestor around 1400 AD. Go a bit farther, and we find a common Earthling ancestor around 3,000 BC. It’s neat stuff. But it’s all based in mathematical models, not real genetic data.
Until now. USC and UC Davis researchers Peter Ralph and Graham Coop have surveyed the genomes of 2,257 Europeans in order to put some real data behind those models. Because of the random shuffling of chromosome fragments that created your father’s sperm and your mother’s egg, you, your siblings and your cousins all share varying chunks of DNA. People who are more closely related share more of these chunks. Depending on how many chunks are shared between two people, we can calculate their approximate relation to each other. Using 2 million shared sequences and a lot of math, they proved the mathematical models correct. Turkish people are more related to other Turks than to someone from Portugal, but they are related enough that, not only do they share one common ancestor a few hundred years ago, but they share every ancestor if you go back a mere thousand years. The models guessed that a long time ago, but now we have the data to prove it.It’s likely that these patterns extend to other regions of Earth, although the numbers might be slightly (but not that) different.
Next time someone in your neck of the ethnic woods points out a famous relative or claims blue-blood descent, remind them that they aren’t so special. All street-sweepers are royalty, all nobles are peasants, and we are all Kings and Queens.
Read more at NatGeo. Have more questions? Also check out the great FAQ on the project from the researchers themselves.
(via steeples)
Posted on May 16, 2013 via It's Okay To Be Smart with 497 notes
Source: jtotheizzoe
-
Crust Punk Overboard on Flickr.
EDIT: this post is getting enough attention that I feel it warrants me putting a shameless plug for my bigcartel site where you can buy my zines and originals
Posted on May 16, 2013 via WILL LAREN with 1,708 notes





